see tex file
so we start our journey here. basically, we look at what programmers say when they talk about beautiful code.
we see there are different kinds of beauty, also by including examples, which might be devoid of context for now
but we also see that all these kinds might relate to understanding. so we turn to this next
so what’s up with understanding? turns out code is tricky to understand because
it has to talk to machines
and to humans
but maybe we can get more by relating it to other fields of aesthetics and see what they have to offer
here, we look at how literature, architecture and maths deal with beauty and understanding
now that we have stronger concepts, let’s dive back into code
here is where we develop more our theory.
as we have our typology, we realize that they are all a bit all over the place. is there something that binds them all? yes, programming languages, so we turn to that next to see how a medium/object/material can meet all those at once
we see how programming languages deal with understanding between computers and humans, and how they have to provide an interface to deal with meaning.
we also look into language-dependent features, and language-independent features.
so we conclude on language as a material to embody a theory of semantico-spatial cognition
we wrap it all up nicely